Guidelines for KeyDB clients with support for KeyDB Sentinel
KeyDB Sentinel is a monitoring solution for KeyDB instances that handles automatic failover of KeyDB masters and service discovery (who is the current master for a given group of instances?). Since Sentinel is both responsible for reconfiguring instances during failovers, and providing configurations to clients connecting to KeyDB masters or replicas, clients are required to have explicit support for KeyDB Sentinel.
This document is targeted at KeyDB clients developers that want to support Sentinel in their clients implementation with the following goals:
- Automatic configuration of clients via Sentinel.
- Improved safety of KeyDB Sentinel automatic failover.
For details about how KeyDB Sentinel works, please check the KeyDB Documentation, as this document only contains information needed for KeyDB client developers, and it is expected that readers are familiar with the way KeyDB Sentinel works.
#
KeyDB service discovery via SentinelKeyDB Sentinel identifies every master with a name like "stats" or "cache". Every name actually identifies a group of instances, composed of a master and a variable number of replicas.
The address of the KeyDB master that is used for a specific purpose inside a network may change after events like an automatic failover, a manually triggered failover (for instance in order to upgrade a KeyDB instance), and other reasons.
Normally KeyDB clients have some kind of hard-coded configuration that specifies the address of a KeyDB master instance within a network as IP address and port number. However if the master address changes, manual intervention in every client is needed.
A KeyDB client supporting Sentinel can automatically discover the address of a KeyDB master from the master name using KeyDB Sentinel. So instead of a hard coded IP address and port, a client supporting Sentinel should optionally be able to take as input:
- A list of ip:port pairs pointing to known Sentinel instances.
- The name of the service, like "cache" or "timelines".
This is the procedure a client should follow in order to obtain the master address starting from the list of Sentinels and the service name.
#
Step 1: connecting to the first SentinelThe client should iterate the list of Sentinel addresses. For every address it should try to connect to the Sentinel, using a short timeout (in the order of a few hundreds of milliseconds). On errors or timeouts the next Sentinel address should be tried.
If all the Sentinel addresses were tried without success, an error should be returned to the client.
The first Sentinel replying to the client request should be put at the start of the list, so that at the next reconnection, we'll try first the Sentinel that was reachable in the previous connection attempt, minimizing latency.
#
Step 2: ask for master addressOnce a connection with a Sentinel is established, the client should retry to execute the following command on the Sentinel:
Where master-name should be replaced with the actual service name specified by the user.
The result from this call can be one of the following two replies:
- An ip:port pair.
- A null reply. This means Sentinel does not know this master.
If an ip:port pair is received, this address should be used to connect to the KeyDB master. Otherwise if a null reply is received, the client should try the next Sentinel in the list.
#
Step 3: call the ROLE command in the target instanceOnce the client discovered the address of the master instance, it should
attempt a connection with the master, and call the ROLE
command in order
to verify the role of the instance is actually a master.
If the ROLE
commands is not available (it was introduced in KeyDB 2.8.12), a client may resort to the INFO replication
command parsing the role:
field of the output.
If the instance is not a master as expected, the client should wait a short amount of time (a few hundreds of milliseconds) and should try again starting from Step 1.
#
Handling reconnectionsOnce the service name is resolved into the master address and a connection is established with the KeyDB master instance, every time a reconnection is needed, the client should resolve again the address using Sentinels restarting from Step 1. For instance Sentinel should contacted again the following cases:
- If the client reconnects after a timeout or socket error.
- If the client reconnects because it was explicitly closed or reconnected by the user.
In the above cases and any other case where the client lost the connection with the KeyDB server, the client should resolve the master address again.
#
Sentinel failover disconnectionWhen KeyDB Sentinel changes the configuration of an instance, for example promoting a replica to a master, demoting a master to replicate to the new master after a failover, or simply changing the master address of a stale replica instance, it sends a CLIENT KILL type normal
command to the instance in order to make sure all the clients are disconnected from the reconfigure instance. This will force clients to resolve the master address again.
If the client will contact a Sentinel with yet not updated information, the verification of the KeyDB instance role via the ROLE
command will fail, allowing the client to detect that the contacted Sentinel provided stale information, and will try again.
Note: it is possible that a stale master returns online at the same time a client contacts a stale Sentinel instance, so the client may connect with a stale master, and yet the ROLE output will match. However when the master is back again Sentinel will try to demote it to replica, triggering a new disconnection. The same reasoning applies to connecting to stale replicas that will get reconfigured to replicate with a different master.
#
Connecting to replicasSometimes clients are interested to connect to replicas, for example in order to scale read requests. This protocol supports connecting to replicas by modifying step 2 slightly. Instead of calling the following command:
The clients should call instead:
In order to retrieve a list of replica instances.
Symmetrically the client should verify with the ROLE
command that the
instance is actually a replica, in order to avoid scaling read queries with
the master.
#
Connection poolsFor clients implementing connection pools, on reconnection of a single connection, the Sentinel should be contacted again, and in case of a master address change all the existing connections should be closed and connected to the new address.
#
Error reportingThe client should correctly return the information to the user in case of errors. Specifically:
- If no Sentinel can be contacted (so that the client was never able to get the reply to
SENTINEL get-master-addr-by-name
), an error that clearly states that KeyDB Sentinel is unreachable should be returned. - If all the Sentinels in the pool replied with a null reply, the user should be informed with an error that Sentinels don't know this master name.
#
Sentinels list automatic refreshOptionally once a successful reply to get-master-addr-by-name
is received, a client may update its internal list of Sentinel nodes following this procedure:
- Obtain a list of other Sentinels for this master using the command
SENTINEL sentinels <master-name>
. - Add every ip:port pair not already existing in our list at the end of the list.
It is not needed for a client to be able to make the list persistent updating its own configuration. The ability to upgrade the in-memory representation of the list of Sentinels can be already useful to improve reliability.
#
Subscribe to Sentinel events to improve responsivenessThe Sentinel documentation shows how clients can connect to Sentinel instances using Pub/Sub in order to subscribe to changes in the KeyDB instances configurations.
This mechanism can be used in order to speedup the reconfiguration of clients, that is, clients may listen to Pub/Sub in order to know when a configuration change happened in order to run the three steps protocol explained in this document in order to resolve the new KeyDB master (or replica) address.
However update messages received via Pub/Sub should not substitute the above procedure, since there is no guarantee that a client is able to receive all the update messages.